State and vertical
PI Core is focused on Colorado investigation work: intake, assignments, surveillance notes, evidence references, recording-law review context, attorney handoffs, and migration from PI case management systems.
Quick answer
PI Core is Butler's private investigation case management software for Colorado private investigation firms. The page applies the locked state+vertical pattern to Colorado: state court and regulatory context, vertical-specific workflow planning, pricing, migration, FAQs, and public source citations. Pricing follows Butler's uniform structure at $99, $149, $199, or custom by user count, with a 3-month free trial and founding cohort discounts where spots remain. Migration is framed around common incumbent systems such as CROSStrax, Trackops, CaseFleet. PI Core treats Colorado-specific rules as workflow context: licensing, recording-law, surveillance, and evidence-use questions remain practitioner-reviewed implementation context. Butler does not claim automatic legal deadline calculation, court filing, license renewal filing, recording-law decisions, or direct court integration on this page.
PI Core in Colorado
Butler serves Colorado investigation firms remotely; this page does not claim a Butler facility, licensing relationship, or operating entity in Colorado.
Colorado PI work varies by licensing posture, surveillance environment, recording-law review, client type, and attorney handoff requirements.
PI Core keeps state-specific compliance issues visible as practitioner-reviewed workflow context rather than automatic legal or licensing decisions.
Colorado regulatory landscape
Colorado investigation software has to account for licensing or local compliance diligence, surveillance documentation, recording-law review, evidence organization, and attorney handoff workflows. PI Core's state-specific page narrows the state hub's general landscape to investigation operations.
Colorado is handled with the established no-statewide-PI-license framing from the state hub work. PI Core supports local compliance diligence, assignment records, evidence organization, and attorney handoffs without claiming a statewide licensing framework that is not verified.
Colorado recording-law review is treated as practitioner-reviewed context. PI Core can keep consent notes, interview context, audio flags, and attorney review status visible, but it does not decide recording-law questions.
Colorado PI work can involve photos, video, audio, reports, field notes, public-record research, witness interviews, and attorney work product. PI Core organizes evidence references and review status; it does not claim forensic admissibility analysis.
The Colorado Judicial Branch describes District Courts as hearing civil cases in any amount, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, probate, and mental health cases. County Courts handle misdemeanors, traffic infractions, felony complaints that may be sent to district court, protection orders, small claims, and lower-value civil cases. Legal Core's Colorado value is strongest where county-court and district-court events trigger defense deadlines and follow-up. PI Core keeps retaining attorney context, report drafts, supporting media, delivery status, and privilege-sensitive handoff notes together for review.
Workflow specificity
PI Core's Colorado workflow framing focuses on modern investigation operations: field assignments, surveillance documentation, evidence organization, recording-law review context, and attorney handoffs.
PI Core can organize client, referring attorney, case type, assignment scope, investigator, deadline context, and report expectations for Colorado investigations. Scope and licensing decisions remain practitioner-reviewed.
Colorado field work can require clean logs, timestamps, location context, photos, video references, observations, and follow-up tasks. PI Core organizes the record without claiming automatic admissibility or surveillance-law analysis.
PI Core can make Colorado recording-law review visible through audio flags, consent notes, interview context, and attorney review status. It does not decide whether a recording is lawful or usable.
Colorado investigators working with attorneys need report drafts, exhibit references, supporting media, delivery notes, and privilege context organized together. PI Core supports the handoff record while the firm decides the reporting format.
Colorado firms moving from CROSStrax, Trackops, CaseFleet can use the PI Core trial period for a parallel run. Imported cases, contacts, reports, evidence references, media links, assignments, and notes are reviewed before cutover.
City-level PI Core
These city+vertical pages add county court, local bar, custody, licensing, and implementation-scope context beneath this state+vertical page.
PI Core coverage for Denver County practitioners, with city-specific authority and workflow context layered under theColorado page.
Review Denver PI CorePricing and programs
PI Core uses Butler's uniform pricing structure: Starter at $99 per user per month, Small Team at $149 per user per month, Firm at $199 per user per month, and custom pricing above 25 users. PI Core includes a 3-month free trial. Each product has a founding cohort with 100 spots and 25% off for 2 years, plus an application-based design partner program with 10 spots per product.
Migration
PI Core migration follows Butler's existing migration program. Founding cohort customers receive migration free. Standard cloud-to-cloud migration is $499 for typical scope up to 5,000 records. Complex migration is $1,499 for multi-source histories, large document libraries, or unusual source structures. Migration fees are credited back as platform credit after 6 months of paid subscription.
Colorado PI Core FAQ
Yes. PI Core is built for investigation firms that need structured intake, assignments, evidence organization, surveillance notes, attorney handoff context, reporting workflow, audit-oriented operations, and migration support.
The state hub work treats Colorado as a no-statewide-PI-license jurisdiction for Butler content. PI Core therefore frames licensing as local compliance diligence and practitioner review, not as a statewide renewal workflow.
PI Core can keep consent notes, audio flags, interview context, and attorney review status close to the case. It does not decide whether a recording is lawful or usable. Investigators should keep practitioner or attorney review in the workflow.
PI Core supports organization of surveillance logs, timestamps, locations, narrative notes, photos, video references, report drafts, and delivery status. The page does not claim forensic hash verification or automatic admissibility analysis.
PI Core keeps attorney, client, case, privilege context, report drafts, supporting media, assignments, and delivery status together. This helps firms maintain a cleaner handoff record for litigation or criminal defense support.
Yes, where usable exports or records are available. Migration review identifies cases, contacts, assignments, notes, reports, evidence references, media libraries, and active deadlines during the PI Core trial period.
Active investigations should be handled through a parallel-run plan. Investigators can validate assignments, case status, report drafts, evidence references, surveillance notes, and attorney handoffs before cutover.
No. PI Core can keep review prompts, notes, source context, and attorney review status visible, but investigators remain responsible for legal, ethical, licensing, and client-specific decisions.
Butler does not position PI Core as the cheapest option. Pricing is per user at $99, $149, $199, or custom by user count, with founding cohort discounts where available. The reason to evaluate PI Core is investigation workflow fit.
Start with PI Core pricing if user count, trial period, founding cohort eligibility, and migration terms are the main questions. Use contact for licensing, recording-law review, surveillance evidence, attorney handoffs, or migration scoping.
Public sources cited
State and vertical information cited from public sources current as of May 4, 2026. Butler updates state+vertical content as court, licensing, and practice rules change.
Colorado PI Core evaluation
Use pricing if the main question is user count, trial period, founding cohort, or migration terms. Use contact if the question is state-specific court fit, source-system migration, or implementation scope.