PI case management basics
Trackops publicly covers core case and case request management, client and contact management, employee and vendor management, invoicing, retainers, reporting, and customization.
Trackops alternative for private investigation firms
Switch from Trackops when investigation work needs stronger evidence operations.
Trackops is PI-specific case management with public pricing, case requests, clients, investigators, mobile apps, reporting, invoicing, document generation, scheduling, and API options. The switching question is whether modern evidence-heavy investigation work now needs deeper chain-of-custody context, attorney handoffs, audit visibility, and media processing.
Quick answer
PI Core is the Trackops alternative when evidence workflow becomes the operating center.
Trackops is private investigation case management with public Basic, Plus, and Premium plans at $99, $149, and $199/month, plus additional full-access staff charges and storage add-ons. Its public materials emphasize case and case request management, clients, employees, vendors, invoices, retainers, reporting, branding, TLS encryption, mobile apps for iOS and Android, video apps, time and expense tracking, document generation, scheduling, case review, and developer API access on higher tiers. Butler PI Core is built for investigation firms that need case intake, evidence handling, chain-of-custody context, surveillance documentation, skip-tracing context, attorney handoffs, court-ready delivery, audit visibility, and modern document and media processing organized around investigation work. Trackops may be the better fit for firms that value configurability, established PI case-management basics, and a lower monthly plan structure. PI Core becomes the stronger fit when evidence integrity, attorney delivery, audit trails, and multi-format review are the main operating constraints. Butler migration supports a parallel run during PI Core's 3-month free trial, with free migration for founding customers, $499 standard cloud-to-cloud migration, and $1,499 complex migration where scope requires it. The switch is about evidence-grade workflow, not a generic savings claim.
What Trackops handles well
Trackops is a real PI case-management product.
Trackops should not be treated as generic project management. It has PI-specific case, client, staff, vendor, mobile, reporting, and billing workflows that many firms recognize.
Public scalable pricing
Trackops publishes Basic, Plus, and Premium plans with included full-access staff, unlimited limited-access staff, storage, and add-on pricing for additional full-access staff and storage.
Mobile and video tools
Trackops lists mobile apps for iOS and Android and video apps for Mac and Windows, giving investigators tools beyond a desk-based case file.
Configurability and support
Trackops emphasizes customization, branding, onboarding, support, documentation, security, and scalability for firms with different investigation workflows.
Investigation workflow fit
Where Trackops may not fit modern evidence-heavy PI work.
Trackops covers PI case management. Butler's case is narrower: digital evidence, attorney-facing delivery, auditability, and multi-format processing need to become the center of the workflow.
Digital evidence as chain-of-custody objects
Trackops centralizes cases, files, reports, and investigator work. PI Core's differentiator is treating evidence as operational objects with source detail, review status, custody context, delivery history, and audit visibility.
Surveillance documentation metadata
Surveillance documentation needs timestamps, location context, media references, investigator notes, and report-ready organization. PI Core is shaped around surveillance as evidence workflow. Trackops has mobile and video tools, but evidence metadata integrity is the Butler focus.
Attorney handoff workflows
Investigation firms often serve attorneys who need matter-ready delivery rather than a generic report or file share. PI Core is built around attorney handoffs, evidence packets, report context, and delivery visibility.
AI-assisted document and media processing
Modern PI cases can include large document sets, audio, video, photos, and mixed digital evidence. Butler's product direction includes OCR, transcription, video processing allowances, and review workflows. That processing layer is central to PI Core's positioning.
Audit visibility for sensitive investigations
Sensitive investigations need records of access, evidence movement, document changes, delivery, and administrative activity. PI Core is built around audit-aware operations. Trackops has security positioning, but Butler makes audit visibility part of investigation workflow.
Migration from Trackops
Switching should preserve case history and evidence context.
Trackops-to-Butler migration has to account for active cases, case requests, investigators, vendors, clients, notes, documents, reports, invoices, retainers, schedules, and evidence references.
What Butler imports from Trackops
PI Core migration starts with the source export and the records that matter operationally: people, cases, dates, documents, notes, financial context, assignments, communication history, and field records where the source system makes them available.
Parallel run during trial
PI Core includes a 3-month free trial. The standard pattern is to run both systems during that period while active work continues and the team validates imported records before cutover.
Cutover by workflow
The cutover can happen by office, team, or workflow instead of as a single risky switch. Field teams keep working while administrators verify records, documents, dates, and communication context.
Data integrity review
Butler checks record counts, document availability, date relationships, assignment context, and obvious import discrepancies before the customer transitions primary operations. The migration is reviewed before it becomes live.
Migration pricing for Trackops switchers
Migration is free for PI Core founding cohort customers. Standard cloud-to-cloud migration is $499 for typical scope. Complex migrations with large evidence libraries, multi-year history, custom workflows, or multiple source systems are $1,499. All migration fees are credited back as platform credit after 6 months of paid subscription.
Pricing comparison
Trackops can be cheaper; Butler is priced for evidence-grade workflow.
Trackops publishes plan bases with additional full-access staff charges. PI Core is per-user pricing. The comparison depends on staff mix and storage, not only total investigator count.
| Comparison point | Trackops | Butler |
|---|---|---|
| Published pricing posture | Public plans: Basic $99/month, Plus $149/month, Premium $199/month, plus additional full-access staff and storage charges. | $99, $149, and $199 per user/month by tier; custom above 25 users. |
| Calculator posture | Use Trackops's public pricing where available. Enter actual spend when storage, processing, add-ons, user mix, or custom terms change the comparison. | Published PI Core tiers with the founding cohort discount shown where eligible. |
| 5-user example | A 5-full-access-staff firm on Trackops Plus is $296/month using the public base plus added full-access staff; Premium is $376/month. | 5 users on PI Core Small Team are $745/month standard or $558.75/month with founding discount. |
| Switch rationale | PI-specific case management with mobile, reporting, scheduling, invoicing, and configurable case workflows. | Evidence handling, chain-of-custody context, attorney handoffs, audit visibility, and modern document and media processing. |
Use your actual Trackops staff mix and storage.
Trackops pricing depends on full-access staff count, limited-access staff, storage, plan level, and add-ons. Butler will often cost more for comparable team sizes. PI Core has to earn that difference through evidence handling, attorney delivery, audit visibility, and modern document and media processing.
Review PI Core pricing detailFit guidance
When you should not switch from Trackops.
Some firms should stay with Trackops. If current PI case-management basics, mobile access, reporting, invoicing, scheduling, and configurable workflows already fit, and evidence handling is not a pain point, switching may not justify the cost. Butler is strongest when evidence integrity, surveillance documentation, attorney handoffs, and audit visibility are the bottleneck.
Switching questions
Questions investigation firms ask before leaving Trackops.
Is Butler PI Core more expensive than Trackops?
Often, yes. Trackops publishes plan bases with two full-access staff included and additional full-access staff charges. PI Core is per-user pricing, so five users are $745/month standard or $558.75/month with founding discount. The switch should be justified by evidence workflow and attorney delivery, not savings.
How should I compare Trackops full-access staff pricing?
Use the actual staff mix. Trackops includes unlimited limited-access staff but charges for additional full-access staff and storage. Butler counts users under its tiers. A clean comparison requires knowing which investigators, admins, vendors, and clients need which access level.
Can I run Butler and Trackops in parallel?
Yes. PI Core includes a 3-month free trial. Firms can keep active cases in Trackops while Butler imports data, validates evidence context, reviews reports and documents, and starts selected new investigation work in PI Core.
How long does Trackops-to-Butler migration take?
Most cloud-to-cloud migrations complete in 2-5 business days when exports are clean. Complex migrations can take 1-3 weeks when there are large evidence libraries, custom workflows, multi-year history, unusual data shapes, or multiple source systems.
What happens to historical Trackops data?
Butler imports active case records, client context, documents, notes, reports, billing context, assignments, and evidence references that need to become operational. Some firms keep Trackops available for older closed matters or reference history.
Does Butler replace Trackops mobile tools?
PI Core is built for field investigator context: assignments, notes, surveillance documentation, evidence capture, and delivery readiness. Trackops has mobile tools, so the comparison is not mobile versus no mobile. The Butler case is evidence workflow integration.
What about Trackops video processing tools?
Video workflows should be reviewed specifically. Butler's direction includes video processing allowances and review workflows, while Trackops has video-related tools and support content. A firm should compare actual surveillance media handling before switching.
Does Butler handle Trackops reports and templates?
Some reports and templates can be recreated, some should be redesigned, and some may stay outside the initial migration. Butler should review the reports that attorneys, clients, and courts actually rely on before promising one-for-one replacement.
Does Butler integrate with Trackops-connected services?
Integrations need review one by one. Some workflows can move into PI Core, some remain external, and some require a replacement path. Butler should map current dependencies before migration starts.
What if migration goes wrong?
The parallel-run period protects the firm from a forced cutover. If cases, reports, documents, assignments, evidence references, or billing context need correction, the firm can keep operating in Trackops while Butler fixes the mapping.
What if we primarily need scheduling and invoicing?
If scheduling, invoicing, retainers, client records, and basic case management are the main needs, Trackops may remain the better fit. Butler is strongest when evidence handling, surveillance documentation, attorney delivery, and audit visibility become the harder problems.
Who should stay with Trackops?
Stay with Trackops when current PI case management, pricing, mobile tools, reports, and workflow customization already fit. Switch to Butler when the firm needs a stronger evidence-grade operating model around chain of custody, attorney handoffs, media processing, and auditability.
Sources checked
Comparison claims stay tied to public sources.
Trackops can change pricing, plan packaging, and feature details over time. This page uses public Trackops pricing and feature sources, then recommends comparing against the firm's actual staff mix and storage needs.
Ready to compare?
Start with investigation workflow, then compare Trackops.
Bring your current Trackops plan, active case volume, evidence library concerns, attorney delivery needs, templates, and the investigation workflow that feels hardest to defend today.